A History of Revisions to the SAT, Part 1: The 1800s through the 1950s

Josh, why are you writing about a topic that every other person on this planet will find horribly boring?

Because I’m the only person who matters.

And because the history of standardized tests is fascinating. I mean, how did we wind up in a world where the course of students’ futures is determined by bubbles on an answer document?

More importantly, however, I’m writing about the history of the SAT format in order to use this history as a lens with which to view the changes to happening to the test in 2023-2024.

Most importantly, somebody decided it was a good thing to give me the ability to publish any writings on this blog that I wish…as long as they are related to tests or test prep. So the joke’s on you, Poindexter. If you don’t like it, you can get your own blog.

In this brief-ish history, I’ll be focusing on the changes to the test itself as well as the explicitly stated reasons for those changes. Many of the changes also have a goal of reducing biases in the test, but I’ll save that discussion for the book I’ll be begged to write after this post goes viral.

Hello, publishers.

I know you’ve been searching high and low for a thousand-page, impenetrable tome about the history of high-stakes college entrance exams. Ideally, this book would be written by some jerk who’s been convinced by the polite laughter of those forced to listen to his jokes that he’s a real comedian. Look no further. I’m your Huckleberry.

I’ll use this first part to focus on the beginnings of the test through the first really “standardized” versions. The second part will cover the first national panic over SAT test prep and score declines while the test itself remained fairly stagnant. The third part will discuss the whiplash of test format changes we’ve seen from the mid-‘90s to today.

A Short Tangent on Pre-SAT College Entrance Exams

An Apology from the author: I’m deeply sorry to the single living person who loves the ACT and SAT. The “joke” with which I ended the previous paragraph was tone-deaf, insensitive, and unfunny. To show that I have learned my lesson, I will be donating $80-100 to two nonprofits—ACT, Inc. and the College Board—in the form of test fees the next time I sit for their respective tests.

In the early days of the 20th century, the College Entrance Examination Board was founded, and the first common college entrance exams were administered.

When the U.S. entered “The Great War” in the 1910s, the Army experimented with using multiple-choice tests to assign jobs to the massive influx of draftees. After the war, some idiot thought, “Hey, why don’t we take those Army tests, change them to high-stakes nightmares, and use them torture high school students around the country?”

Admittedly, I might have paraphrased that last part, but that’s the gist of it. Let’s stop living in the past and start living in the future: 1926.

Part 1: From Humble Beginnings

The 1920s

At this time, the fee to take the SAT was $ 15, which is closer to $ 230 in 2022 dollars. With one yearly test administration, the College Board could price gouge use the law of supply and demand to appropriately price their test.

By 1938, enough additional schools had signed on to use the SAT as part of their admissions process that it started to become a de facto national test.

The 1940s & 50s

The ’41-’42 reference group would continue to be used to scale SAT scores until 1994. Nothing about our world, country, students, or education system changed in those 50+ years, so this was a great call by the College Board.

The test content continued to change during the ’40s and ’50s as well.. During these years, the “classic” SAT took shape.

The Verbal section now consisted of familiarly unfamiliar Reading Comprehension, Analogies, Antonyms, and Sentence Completion questions.

On the Math section, all questions were “upgraded” to include five answer choices, and, in 1959, Data Sufficiency questions arrived. These questions presented students with two statements, asking them which statement (or both or neither) was sufficient to answer a question related to the statements.

A very real Data Sufficiency question from a previous SAT.

Summary of Part 1 and Teaser for Part 2

[Editor’s Note: Josh, change this to something more exciting. No one will want to read a section with such a straightforward heading. Also, remember to delete this editor’s note once the change has been made, you idiot.]

The first thirty years of the SAT were a time of great change to the format, administration, and scoring systems of the test. The test—conceived as a way to eliminate separate, college-specific entrance exams—served its purpose and gained steam.

Early twentieth-century educators were excited about the possibilities of standardized tests because these tests were cutting edge stuff. We could finally quantify the qualitative and reduce our children down to numbers. No longer were you forced to think of little Jimmy as the summation of his experiences, actions, thoughts, and feelings. Now, you only had to remember 1080. Way to go, 1080—I mean, “Jimmy.”

Part 2 will discuss the next thirty or so years of the test, including calls for the SAT to change and the College Board’s resistance to such changes.



Works Cited & Referenced

College Entrance Examination Board (1926). Annual Report of the Commission on Scholastic Aptitude Tests. College Entrance Examination Board. 

Wondering what changes came next? Surely things that will help students, lets find out.

Click here to read Part 2 where Josh will discuss changes made from 1960-1993. Please share this post with someone who may find it useful!

Similar Posts